Bakhtina Sofya b84cb877be 1st comm | 3 weeks ago | |
---|---|---|
.. | ||
LICENSE | 3 weeks ago | |
README.md | 3 weeks ago | |
index.d.ts | 3 weeks ago | |
index.js | 3 weeks ago | |
package.json | 3 weeks ago |
queueMicrotask
shim for modern enginesqueueMicrotask
in all modern JS engines.queueMicrotask
in modern environmentsPromise.resolve().then(fn)
in Node.js 10 and earlier, and old browsers (same performance as queueMicrotask
)npm install queue-microtask
const queueMicrotask = require('queue-microtask')
queueMicrotask(() => { /* this will run soon */ })
queueMicrotask
and why would one use it?The queueMicrotask
function is a WHATWG standard. It queues a microtask to be executed prior to control returning to the event loop.
A microtask is a short function which will run after the current task has completed its work and when there is no other code waiting to be run before control of the execution context is returned to the event loop.
The code queueMicrotask(fn)
is equivalent to the code Promise.resolve().then(fn)
. It is also very similar to process.nextTick(fn)
in Node.
Using microtasks lets code run without interfering with any other, potentially higher priority, code that is pending, but before the JS engine regains control over the execution context.
See the spec or Node documentation for more information.
This package allows you to use queueMicrotask
safely in all modern JS engines. Use it if you prioritize small JS bundle size over support for old browsers.
If you just need to support Node 12 and later, use queueMicrotask
directly. If you need to support all versions of Node, use this package.
process.nextTick
?In Node, queueMicrotask
and process.nextTick
are essentially equivalent, though there are subtle differences that don't matter in most situations.
You can think of queueMicrotask
as a standardized version of process.nextTick
that works in the browser. No need to rely on your browser bundler to shim process
for the browser environment.
setTimeout(fn, 0)
?This approach is the most compatible, but it has problems. Modern browsers throttle timers severely, so setTimeout(…, 0)
usually takes at least 4ms to run. Furthermore, the throttling gets even worse if the page is backgrounded. If you have many setTimeout
calls, then this can severely limit the performance of your program.
immediate
or asap
?These packages are great! However, if you prioritize small JS bundle size over optimal performance in old browsers then you may want to consider this package.
This package (queue-microtask
) is four times smaller than immediate
, twice as small as asap
, and twice as small as using process.nextTick
and letting the browser bundler shim it automatically.
Note: This package throws an exception in JS environments which lack Promise
support -- which are usually very old browsers and Node.js versions.
Since the queueMicrotask
API is supported in Node.js, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera, and Edge, the vast majority of users will get optimal performance. Any JS environment with Promise
, which is almost all of them, also get optimal performance. If you need support for JS environments which lack Promise
support, use one of the alternative packages.
In computer programming, a shim is a library that transparently intercepts API calls and changes the arguments passed, handles the operation itself or redirects the operation elsewhere. – Wikipedia
This package could also be described as a "ponyfill".
A ponyfill is almost the same as a polyfill, but not quite. Instead of patching functionality for older browsers, a ponyfill provides that functionality as a standalone module you can use. – PonyFoo
queueMicrotask(fn)
The queueMicrotask()
method queues a microtask.
The fn
argument is a function to be executed after all pending tasks have completed but before yielding control to the browser's event loop.
MIT. Copyright (c) Feross Aboukhadijeh.